Close

Articles Posted in Disability Discrimination

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Carta v. Wingate Healthcare…Employee Gets Emotional Distress Damages in Disability Discrimination Case

Overview: In Carta v. Wingate Healthcare, the MCAD found in favor of the Complainant, a 69-year-old and qualified handicapped individual who was terminated from her health care position. The MCAD awarded emotional distress damages and ordered the Respondent to conduct training of certain human resources employees after the Complainant was…

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Savage v. Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission…Employee Wins Disability Discrimination Case

Overview: In Savage v. Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission, the MCAD found in favor of the Complainant and awarded substantial back pay and emotional distress damages for employment discrimination based on a disability. The Complainant had a history of dyslexia, attention deficit disorder, and chronic depression prior to being hired by the…

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Bako v. Omega Foods…Dunkin’ Donuts Franchise Operator Sees Complaint Dismissed

Overview: In Bako v. Omega Foods, the MCAD found in favor of the Respondent and dismissed the complaint accusing the Dunkin’ Donuts operator of discrimination based on disability after the employee was not immediately returned to her prior shift following a nine-month medical leave of absence for breast cancer treatment.…

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Cooper v. Raytheon…Employee Wins Handicap Discrimination Case

Overview: In Cooper v. Raytheon, the MCAD found in favor of the Complainant and awarded emotional distress damages. This is the MCAD’s third decision in 2016. In finding that Raytheon engaged in handicap discrimination, the hearing officer noted that the Complainant’s managers knew that he suffered from a brain injury…

Updated:

MCAD Digest: Lammlin v. Seder Foods…Employee Wins Race Discrimination Case

Overview: In Lammlin v. Seder Foods, the MCAD found in favor of the Complainant and awarded back pay and emotional distress damages. This is the MCAD’s first decision in 2016. This case included direct evidence of discriminatory bias, where the Respondent testified at public hearing that he sought a “salesperson…

Contact Us