Overview: In Chase-Eason v. Crescent Yacht Club, the MCAD found in favor of the Complainants, awarding back pay to one of them and emotional distress damages to both. Complainant Eason was subjected to unwanted touching and vulgar comments that were sufficiently severe to alter the conditions of her employment and create a hostile work environment. Even though she did engage in bawdy banter, she “did not waiver in her efforts to protest the behavior directed against her.” The fact that some harassment occurred when Complainant Eason was off duty did not negate the employee/supervisor relationship.
The hearing officer similarly concluded that Complainant Chase was subjected to unwanted touching and hostile language sufficiently severe to constitute harassment. Both Complainants were entitled to emotional distress damages. Complainant Eason, who was terminated, was also entitled to back pay; Complainant Chase, who quit voluntarily, was not.
Decision Date: May 19, 2016
Docket Number: 12-BEM-02539; 12-BEM-02540
Hearing Officer: Betty E. Waxman
Claims: Sexual harassment and retaliation
Prevailing Party: Complainants
Back Pay: $16,658 (Eason)
Front Pay: $0
Emotional Distress: $10,000 (Eason); $7,000 (Chase)
Learn More
- Do you have an employment law issue? / Contact → David Conforto
- Our success representing employees / Our Work → Success Stories
- Be Selective / Choose Us → Client Testimonials
Your Success ǀ Our Goal. Let us help.